Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Shimpei Shirafuji

Alec Acebedo

Monday, April 19, 2010
The Story of My Week
Monday, April 12, 2010
Kat King -Industrial Design
Vavara Mikushkina - Art Photography
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Street Art
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Reaction to documentary, Style Wars
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Response to "Father's Day '99" on This American Life
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Visiting Artist: Faythe Levine of "Handmade Nation"
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Daina Mattis
I apologize that I was unable to rotate this image of a painting however, at least it is up. The artist, Daina Mattis has recently displayed her work in the building of Shaffer at Syracuse University. From looking at this painting it seems that it was done with watercolor and pencil on large sheets of paper. The subjects are of a girl and a guy, the former in pink and the latter in blue. The female figure is seated and only the top half of her is defined with color while the rest of her is outlined in pencil. The male is emphasized by his blue jeans and sneaker -a.k.a. the lower half of his body. The girl is shown in profile, looking up at him as his outlined head looks back down at her. Both figures are placed differently and opposite parts of their bodies are emphasized still, they are each touching their shoes. Perhaps this has some significance about their similarities, what their journey together might entail, and gender roles. Nevertheless, this painting as a sweet emotion running through it, one of kind fascination. That only the figures have color seems to show that the setting is unimportant. Together with the lock gazes and turned heads, the viewer almost feels left out of their emotions. The connection between the two subjects appears to be strong, leaving the rest of the world behind.Guy Carlo
Guy Carlo is a photographer whose work is currently being displayed in Shaffer at Syracuse University. This piece is of a pink cut-out goat nailed to a wall. While the wood background seems natural, the industrial-looking pink goat seems to mock nature. The nail is put in place of the eye. This could be a metaphor for "pinning" down nature and making it owned by humans. The eye might represent our point of view as people who consume things that are reminiscent of nature. This photograph shows the relationship between the natural and the industrialized realms by connecting the subject to the background with a sharp object. For our mass-produced objects to exist, we must harm nature, the background and foundation of our existence.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Soundscape
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Good Copy Bad Copy
The film, Good Copy Bad Copy explored the role of copyright laws in today’s world of streaming and piracy. Through interviews with people of various perspectives, the underlining message of the documentary seemed to encourage the restructuring of copyright laws to be compatible with today’s technology. One question that I believe is worth exploring is, “what is the purpose of copyright?” Dan Glickman, chairman and CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) acknowledged that creators play an important part in stimulating culture, and their rights should be protected. At the same time, Creative Commons works with artists, allowing them to individually decide which rights they would like to attach to their work. For example, this documentary emphasized the need to share art and be open to new methods of copyright; in other words, it was completely appropriate to have this film be streamed without charge. If the film had been distributed commercially, the creators would have contradicted themselves. While artists should be protected and compensated, there must be a compromise between the producer and consumer. Streaming has become the norm, piracy unstoppable, and corporations disliked by many. This has not always been the reality, but the fact of the matter is that the world has changed and with that the laws must soon follow because the government is meant to reflect the people. Artists should be compensated, but perhaps how they sell their work will have to be restructured.
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Fabricated Realities
Thomas Demand (Munich, b. 1964) is a photographer who constructs models of famous settings from mass-media images. He then snaps shots of the models and prints them to be life-size. Such settings tend to be places that have significance that most people can attach themselves to; for example, Demand reconstructed the underpass in Paris where Princess Diana met her end. Of these places, we are encouraged, as viewers to consider the story behind his photographs, yet that the photographs only appear to be real places encourages the viewer to consider the nature of photography. In doing this, Demand makes a statement about the misplaced trust that people put in photographs. Images do not tell the entire story, as they are limited to simply one perspective that can be used to manipulate and twist the truth. When producing his models, Demand often leaves evidence of the fact that the setting is merely a representation of a real place. This evidence can be used to allude to the idea that photographs lack credibility and you cannot always believe everything you see or are told. 
